Hillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies

Hillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies

Welcome to Hillicon Valley, The Hill’s e-newsletter detailing all it is advisable know in regards to the tech and cyber information from Capitol Hill to Silicon Valley. In the event you don’t already, make sure to join our e-newsletter with this LINK.

Welcome! Observe our cyber reporter, Maggie Miller (@magmill95), and tech reporter, Chris Mills Rodrigo (@chrisismills), for extra protection.

FOREIGN INTERFERENCE CONTINUES: A senior intelligence official inside the Workplace of the Director of Nationwide Intelligence (ODNI) on Friday warned that Russia, Iran and China are trying to sway the 2020 elections.

William Evanina, the director of the Nationwide Counterintelligence and Safety Middle (NCSC), famous that the ODNI had been commonly briefing members of Congress, presidential campaigns and political committees on these overseas threats to elections “in recent months.”

“Foreign nations continue to use influence measures in social and traditional media in an effort to sway U.S. voters’ preferences and perspectives, to shift U.S. policies, to increase discord and to undermine confidence in our democratic process,” Evanina stated in an announcement on Friday. “The coronavirus pandemic and recent protests, for instance, continue to serve as fodder for foreign influence and disinformation efforts in America.”

He warned that “at this time, we’re primarily concerned with China, Russia and Iran — although other nation states and non-state actors could also do harm to our electoral process. Our insights and judgments will evolve as the election season progresses.”

Evanina stated that China is utilizing affect efforts to “shape the policy environment” in the USA, and was aware that these efforts may “affect the presidential race.”

He warned that each Russia and Iran in contrast are intentionally in search of to weaken U.S. democratic establishments, together with elections, with Russia utilizing “internet trolls and proxies” to unfold disinformation to undermine elections, and Iran circulating “anti-U.S. content” on-line via separate disinformation efforts. 

Amongst different considerations have been makes an attempt by overseas adversaries to achieve entry to election infrastructure, together with via concentrating on marketing campaign communications and federal networks. 

“Our adversaries also seek to compromise our election infrastructure, and we continue to monitor malicious cyber actors trying to gain access to U.S. state and federal networks, including those responsible for managing elections,” Evanina stated. 

Learn extra in regards to the intelligence evaluation right here.

NOT ENOUGH DETAILS? Speaker Nancy PelosiNancy PelosiOn The Cash: Congress set for brawl as unemployment cliff looms | Wave of evictions may very well be coming for nation’s renters | Home approves 9.5B spending bundle Hillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies Mnuchin makes deficit hawks nervous on aid invoice talks MORE (D-Calif.), Senate Minority Chief Charles SchumerChuck SchumerSchumer publicizes Blue Jays will play season in Buffalo Pelosi, Schumer: Rising GOP coronavirus plan ‘falls very brief’ NY group hit Schumer over lack of immigrant advantages in aid measures MORE (D-N.Y.) and different key Democratic leaders in Congress condemned the intelligence evaluation as “not going nearly far enough.”

“The statement just released by NCSC Director William Evanina does not go nearly far enough in arming the American people with the knowledge they need about how foreign powers are seeking to influence our political process,” Pelosi and Schumer stated in a joint assertion with Home Intelligence Committee Chairman Adam SchiffAdam Bennett SchiffHillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies Democrats say intel evaluation on overseas election inference does not go ‘far sufficient’ Hillicon Valley: Democrats request counterintelligence briefing | New strain for election funding | Republicans urge retaliation towards Chinese language hackers MORE (D-Calif.) and Senate Intelligence Committee Vice Chairman Mark WarnerMark Robert WarnerHillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies Democrats say intel evaluation on overseas election inference does not go ‘far sufficient’ Hillicon Valley: Feds warn hackers concentrating on important infrastructure | Twitter exploring subscription service | Invoice would give DHS cyber company subpoena energy MORE (D-Va.).

“The statement gives a false sense of equivalence to the actions of foreign adversaries by listing three countries of unequal intent, motivation and capability together,” the Democratic leaders stated.

“The statement, moreover, fails to fully delineate the goal, nature, scope and capacity to influence our election, information the American people must have as we go into November.”

The Democratic leaders, who’ve all been briefed lately on election threats towards the U.S., had specific considerations round how Evanina described Russian interference efforts.

The highest intelligence group official had warned that Russia was spreading “disinformation in the U.S. that is designed to undermine confidence in our democratic process and denigrate what it sees as an anti-Russia ‘establishment’ in America.” 

The Democratic leaders described that assertion as “almost meaningless,” including that it “omits much on a subject of immense importance.”

Learn extra about their considerations right here.

TRUMP HAS REGRETS: President TrumpDonald John TrumpJustice Dept. says 18 individuals going through federal expenses after Portland protests US takes over former Chinese language consulate in Houston In a single day Protection: GOP senator targets Accomplice base rename | Trump OKs sale of extra giant armed drones MORE acknowledged in an interview launched Friday that he “often” regrets his tweets and retweets.

“It used to be in the old days before this, you’d write a letter and you’d say, ‘this letter is really bad,’ you put it on your desk and you go back tomorrow and you say, ‘oh, I’m glad I didn’t send it,’” Trump advised Barstool Sports activities’ founder Dave Portnoy.

“But we don’t do that with Twitter. We put it out instantaneously, we feel great, and then you start getting phone calls, ‘Did you really say this?’ I say, ‘What’s wrong with that?’ And you find a lot of things,” continued the president, who is commonly the topic of criticism over his use of his Twitter account. “You know what I find? It’s not the tweets, it’s the retweets that get you in trouble.”

Trump went on to say he doesn’t at all times look carefully on the tweets that he shares from his Twitter account, which has 84 million followers.

He had equally stated that a few of his tweets create issues for the White Home in an interview final 12 months.

Trump additionally advised Portnoy he believed Twitter to be a strong messaging instrument, explaining that he makes use of it to chop towards “fake news” — a phrase he typically makes use of in deriding important press protection of his administration.

Trump has an extended monitor file of tweeting or retweeting controversial messages, together with not too long ago sharing a tweet of a video exhibiting an obvious Trump supporter yelling “white power” in response to protesters. Trump later deleted the tweet, and the White Home stated the president had not heard the racist phrase when he shared it.

Learn extra in regards to the interview right here.

RAINCHECK FOR TECH CEOS: The much-anticipated antitrust listening to that includes the CEOs of Amazon, Apple, Fb and Google scheduled for Monday can be postponed for the late Rep. John LewisJohn LewisHillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies The Hill’s 12:30 Report – Introduced by Fb – zero unemployment profit set to run out Tech CEO listening to delayed for John Lewis companies MORE‘s (D-Ga.) memorial service, a supply accustomed to the matter confirmed to The Hill.

It isn’t but clear when the listening to in entrance of the Home Judiciary subcommittee on antitrust will finally happen.

The listening to will mark the primary time that Jeff BezosJeffrey (Jeff) Preston BezosHillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies Tech CEO listening to delayed for John Lewis companies Deepfakes threaten the 2020 election MORE, Tim Cook dinner, Mark ZuckerbergMark Elliot ZuckerbergHillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies Tech CEO listening to delayed for John Lewis companies Fb researchers say findings on racial bias have been ignored by superiors MORE and Sundar Pichai, the leaders of the 4 firms, seem earlier than Congress collectively.

It is seemingly the listening to would have already taken place given the robust needs of lawmakers to schedule it, however the coronavirus pandemic has additionally difficult efforts.

The listening to is aimed toward gathering info for the subcommittee’s report on competitors in digital markets set to be launched later this 12 months. 

Learn extra in regards to the listening to right here.

KAVANAUGH CONCERNS: A coalition of progressive teams is asking on Justice Brett KavanaughBrett Michael KavanaughHillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China concentrating on elections | Trump says he ‘typically’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO listening to postponed for John Lewis companies Progressive teams urge Kavanaugh to recuse himself from Fb case The Susan Collins conundrum MORE to recuse himself from a case towards Fb due to his ties with the platform’s chief of coverage, Joel Kaplan.

Kaplan, a former member of the George W. Bush administration, appeared behind Kavanaugh throughout his contentious Senate affirmation hearings and performed a job in ushering him via the method.

After the listening to, Kaplan known as Kavanaugh and his spouse his “closest pals in D.C.”

The teams, together with the American Financial Liberties Venture, Blue Future and Demand Progress, say that friendship means the justice ought to recuse himself from a category motion case towards Fb scheduled for the Supreme Courtroom’s subsequent time period.

“Brett Kavanaugh must recuse himself from this case based on his deep, personal connections to the top leadership at Facebook,” the groups said in a statement Friday.

“The top lobbyist at Facebook called Kavanaugh his ‘closest friend in Washington’ and even hosted a private celebration for Kavanaugh at his home after he was confirmed despite multiple, credible allegations of sexual assault. Brett Kavanaugh cannot possibly claim to be neutral in this case.”

The case is asking what should be considered an “autodialer” under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act.

The plaintiff in the case, Noah Duguid, claims Facebook used an autodialer to warn him via text that someone accessed his account, although he does not have one.

Duguid claims he was unable to unsubscribe from the messages.

There is precedent for justices recusing themselves from cases involving friends.

Read more about the case here.

FACEBOOK OFFERS TO PAY UP: Facebook has offered $650 million to pay a long-running class-action lawsuit about the use of facial-scanning technology. 

The final offer is $100 million more than the initial settlement, according to USA Today, and follows a rejection of the initial amount by a U.S. district judge earlier this year

“We are focused on settling as it is in the best interest of our community and our shareholders to move past this matter,” Facebook said in a statement.

The case centers around three Illinois residents who sued the social media company under a state law called the Biometric Information Privacy Act, permitting residents to sue if their faces have been scanned for data without written consent.

The residents claim that Facebook’s built-in feature — which suggests people and friends’ names in users’ photos automatically — is a violation of the privacy act.

In January, the initial settlement offer was set at $550 million and would have resulted in payouts of $150 to $300 per person in Illinois that is affected by the facial recognition technology. However, California U.S. District Judge James Donato said the payment was incredibly underwhelming. 

Read more about the lawsuit here.

HOUSE COMMITTEE CLAPS BACK: The House Ways and Means Committee shot back at Elon MuskElon Reeve MuskHillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China targeting elections | Trump says he ‘often’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO hearing postponed for John Lewis services House committee responds to Elon Musk: ‘Thanks billionaire, your opinion is noted’ Hillicon Valley: Feds warn hackers targeting critical infrastructure | Twitter exploring subscription service | Bill would give DHS cyber agency subpoena power MORE on Friday after he criticized Congress’s attempt to pass another round of coronavirus relief legislation. 

“Another government stimulus package is not in the best interests of the people [in my opinion],” the Tesla CEO tweeted earlier Friday.

In response, the Democratic-controlled committee tweeted a popular meme format that reads “Thanks Billionaire, your opinion is noted.”

A new stimulus package has been the main focus for Senate Republicans since the chamber returned to session this week, but Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnellAddison (Mitch) Mitchell McConnellOn The Money: Congress set for brawl as unemployment cliff looms | Wave of evictions could be coming for nation’s renters | House approves 9.5B spending package Hillicon Valley: Senior intelligence official warns Russia, Iran and China targeting elections | Trump says he ‘often’ regrets his tweets | Tech CEO hearing postponed for John Lewis services McConnell Senate opponent Amy McGrath defends out-of-state contributions MORE (R-Ky.) signaled on Thursday that the bill wouldn’t be introduced until next week.

“The administration has requested additional time to review the fine details, but we will be laying down this proposal early next week. We have an agreement in principle on the shape of this package,” McConnell said from the Senate floor.

Read more here.

Lighter click: This is true

An op-ed to chew on: America has to be ready for mail voting to avert an election crisis

NOTABLE LINKS FROM AROUND THE WEB: 

How a Tech-Funded Think Tank Influences Global Antitrust Regulators (New York Times / Daisuke Wakabayashi)

Google Ad Portal Equated “Black Girls” with Porn (The Markup / Leon Yin and Aaron Sankin)

Clear often helps individuals pace previous the TSA line. Now it’s providing a Covid-19 screening service (Recode / Rebecca Heilweil)

Amid antitrust scrutiny, Apple makes quiet energy strikes over builders (Washington Put up / Reed Albergotti)

Source Link

Leave a Reply